How Zamfara Gold Is Fuelling Fresh Agitation In Niger Delta

Fresh agitation is building in the Niger Delta region following perceived inequality in the implementation of the law guiding ownership and exploitation of solid minerals in the country.

Niger Delta leaders and prominent interest groups were said to be angry that indigenous artisans in Zamfara and other parts of the north were allowed to exploit and sell gold and other solid minerals within their domains while such acts were forbidden in the Niger Delta.

It was learnt the matter was aggravated by the alleged sale of a bar of gold to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) at N5bn by the Zamfara Government.

A former agitator, High Chief Sobomabo Jackrich, on Friday backed the recent position of Deputy Senate President, Ovie Omo-Agege, who described the development as unjust and against the law of the country.

Recommended For You

He said the body language of the government suggested the Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act 2007, which was passed into law on March 16, 2007, to repeal the Minerals and Mining Act, no 34 of 1999, applied only to the Niger Delta.

He said: “This law vested the control of all properties and minerals in Nigeria in the state and prohibits unauthorized exploration or exploitation of minerals. Land in which minerals have been found in commercial quantities shall be acquired by the federal government, in accordance with the land use Act. Accordingly, mines and minerals including oilfields, oil mining, geological surveys and natural gas are exclusively under the control of the federal government.

“This has been the case for the people of the Niger Delta, when it comes to managing their God given resources. It looks to us, that the initiators of this legal rule originally had the people of the Niger Delta and their resources in mind, before crafting this obnoxious rule in a federal system of government”.

Jackrich, who is the founder of the Network for Defence of Democracy and Good Governance (NDDGG), said the report of the Zamafara gold and the CBN meant that “there are two different laws for two different people in the same country”.

“A Matawale can mine and sell gold and make revenue for Zamfara state but a Wike cannot drill crude and sell to generate revenue for Rivers state.”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: